linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Remove get_kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHUa44GAM=meibiSDjjWb0wKmHzud6JddE3W=zG3XCFfgP+Sag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:02:34 +0100
From:   Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Remove get_kernel_pages()

Hi Ira,

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 9:28 PM Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Ira Weiny wrote:
> > Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 at 09:36, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sumit,
> > > >
> > > > I did not see a follow up on this series per your last email.[1]  I'd like to
> > > > move forward with getting rid of kmap_to_page().  So Hopefully this can land
> > > > and you can build on this rather than the other way around?
> > >
> > > Apologies Ira for keeping you waiting. Actually I was fully involved
> > > with other high priority work with my upstream review backlog
> > > increasing. So I wasn't able to devote time to this work. Sure I will
> > > rebase my work on top of your changes.
> >
> > No problem on my end.  I just wanted to ensure that I did not miss
> > something.
>
> Andrew, can I get an ack on patches 1 and 4 for this series?  I realized
> that perhaps I was not clear on my expectations of this series.  I was
> thinking this would be easiest to go through the tee subsystem tree.
>
> Sumit or Jens, is that ok with you all?

Sure, I'll take it. The timing is a bit unfortunate, it's likely too
close to the merge window to be included there. However, I'll pick it
up and add it to linux-next so it's ready for the 6.4 merge window.

Thanks,
Jens