[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+pTDFQlX9qNL35z@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:11:08 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
lists@...dbynature.de, mikelley@...rosoft.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] x86/mtrr: support setting MTRR state for software
defined MTRRs
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 04:03:07PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Wouldn't !cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR) be enough?
> >
> > I'm not sure we won't need that for TDX guests, too.
>
> See, that's the problem. I wanna have it simple too. Lemme check with
> dhansen.
He says MTRRs are enabled in TDX guests: "X86_FEATURE_MTRR is fixed to
1 in TDX guests."
So we will have to do the more finer-grained check I guess.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists