[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+pWRx2ly/qdFq9k@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:24:55 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] splice: Use init_sync_kiocb() in
filemap_splice_read()
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 01:46:18PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Use init_sync_kiocb() in filemap_splice_read() rather than open coding it
> and filter out IOCB_NOWAIT since the splice is synchronous.
If the user has asked for NOWAIT and the splice is going to be
synchronous, shouldn't we rather return -EWOULDBLOCK here? Or
does this not block?
IOW, this either does the wrong thing, or it does something that's
irrelevant.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists