[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b67050c-7429-8528-de24-2d923e3c9671@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:43:57 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>
Cc: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] arm64: dts: apple: t8112: Initial t8112 (M2) device
trees
On 13/02/2023 16:08, Janne Grunau wrote:
> On 2023-02-13 15:36:33 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 13/02/2023 15:01, Janne Grunau wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> + pmgr: power-management@...700000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "apple,t8112-pmgr", "apple,pmgr", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
>>>>
>>>> Why this is simple-mfd?
>>>
>>> I suppose because the syscon device is not limited to power domain
>>> controls. The dt-bindings in arm/apple/apple,pmgr.yaml specify those
>>> compatibles. See the original discussion in:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/57991dac-196e-a76d-831a-d4ac166bfe29@marcan.st/
>>
>> This did not answer my concerns. There are no children here.
>
> The child nodes are in t8112-pmgr.dtsi
Ahhh, so this is overridden? Then it's fine.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists