[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+tZE8ixmlIDYrOu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:49:07 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@...wei.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, jroedel@...e.de, vbabka@...e.cz,
hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, eric.devolder@...cle.com,
bhe@...hat.com, tiwai@...e.de, keescook@...omium.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, liwei391@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/kdump: Handle blocked NMIs interrupt to avoid
kdump crashes
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 05:30:46PM +0800, Zeng Heng wrote:
> > I never remember the shutdown paths -- do we force wipe the PMU
> > registers somewhere before this?
>
> I have checked the panic process, and there is no wipe operation for PMU
> registers,
>
> which causes the watchdog bites.
>
> Do you mean we should directly disable PMU registers instead of calling
> `iret_to_self` to
>
> consume blocked NMI interrupts ?
If you don't wipe the PMU, there will be many and continuous NMIs, a
single IRET-to-SELF isn't going to safe you.
Anyway, I had a bit of a grep around and I find we have:
kernel/events/core.c: register_reboot_notifier(&perf_reboot_notifier);
which should end up killing all the PMU activity. Somewhere around there
there's also a CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE ifdef, so I'm thinking it gets called
on the panic->crash-kernel path too?
If not, someone should look at doing something there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists