[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+rSXg14z1Myd8Px@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 17:14:22 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Longlong Xia <xialonglong1@...wei.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, chenwandun@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
sunnanyong@...wei.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/3] driver core: add error handling for
devtmpfs_create_node()
Hi Longlong,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 09:54:42AM +0000, Longlong Xia wrote:
> In some cases, devtmpfs_create_node() can return error value.
> So, make use of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Longlong Xia <xialonglong1@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/core.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 7dab705f2937..aaa3088e5456 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -3405,7 +3405,9 @@ int device_add(struct device *dev)
> if (error)
> goto SysEntryError;
>
> - devtmpfs_create_node(dev);
> + error = devtmpfs_create_node(dev);
> + if (error)
> + goto DevtmpfsError;
> }
>
> /* Notify clients of device addition. This call must come
> @@ -3461,6 +3463,8 @@ int device_add(struct device *dev)
> done:
> put_device(dev);
> return error;
> + DevtmpfsError:
> + device_remove_sys_dev_entry(dev);
> SysEntryError:
> if (MAJOR(dev->devt))
> device_remove_file(dev, &dev_attr_dev);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
After this change in -next as commit 31b4b6730fd4 ("driver core: add
error handling for devtmpfs_create_node()"), my test machines failed to
boot after the rootfs could not be mounted. I added some logging to see
which device was failing, which triggers a few times with the exact same
message:
device: 'btrfs-control': devtmpfs_create_node() failed, err = -17
with -17 being -EEXIST. I am not sure why this device is getting
registered more than once, it appears to occur during module insertion
though, as I am able to get to systemd starting within the initrd.
Should this particular return value be downgraded to a warning so that
the device still loads or should the driver be fixed? I have cc'd the
btrfs mailing list, in case they have any input.
Cheers,
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists