[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230214163744.16377-1-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 18:37:44 +0200
From: "Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" <iuliana.prodan@....nxp.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"S.J. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
Cc: linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v4] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: add module parameter to ignore ready flag from remote processor
From: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
There are cases when we want to test a simple "hello world"
application on the DSP and we don't have IPC between the cores.
Therefore, do not wait for a confirmation from the remote processor
at start.
Added "ignore_dsp_ready" flag while inserting the module to ignore
remote processor reply after start.
By default, this is off - do not ignore reply from rproc.
Signed-off-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
---
Changes since v3
- do not instantiate static var to 0, this is done by default
- do not initialize mailbox if not IPC between the core
Changes since v2
- s/ignoreready/ignore_dsp_ready
Changes since v1
- change BIT(31) to BIT(1) for REMOTE_SKIP_WAIT
---
drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
index 95da1cbefacf..fb69f4e8ee96 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
@@ -26,9 +26,18 @@
#include "remoteproc_elf_helpers.h"
#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
+/*
+ * Module parameters
+ */
+static unsigned int imx_dsp_rproc_ignore_ready;
+module_param_named(ignore_dsp_ready, imx_dsp_rproc_ignore_ready, int, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_dsp_ready,
+ "Ignore remote proc reply after start, default is 0 (off).");
+
#define DSP_RPROC_CLK_MAX 5
#define REMOTE_IS_READY BIT(0)
+#define REMOTE_SKIP_WAIT BIT(1)
#define REMOTE_READY_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES 500
/* att flags */
@@ -282,6 +291,10 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_ready(struct rproc *rproc)
struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
int i;
+ /* No IPC between the cores */
+ if (priv->flags & REMOTE_SKIP_WAIT)
+ return 0;
+
if (!priv->rxdb_ch)
return 0;
@@ -503,6 +516,13 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_init(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
struct mbox_client *cl;
int ret;
+ /*
+ * If there is no IPC between the cores,
+ * then no need to initialize mailbox.
+ */
+ if (priv->flags & REMOTE_SKIP_WAIT)
+ return 0;
+
if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL))
return 0;
@@ -562,6 +582,10 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_init(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
static void imx_dsp_rproc_free_mbox(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
{
+ /* No IPC between the cores */
+ if (priv->flags & REMOTE_SKIP_WAIT)
+ return;
+
mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
mbox_free_channel(priv->rxdb_ch);
@@ -903,6 +927,9 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
priv->rproc = rproc;
priv->dsp_dcfg = dsp_dcfg;
+ if (imx_dsp_rproc_ignore_ready)
+ priv->flags |= REMOTE_SKIP_WAIT;
+
dev_set_drvdata(dev, rproc);
INIT_WORK(&priv->rproc_work, imx_dsp_rproc_vq_work);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists