lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:46:06 -0500
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
        namhyung@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 2/9] perf: Extend ABI to support post-processing
 monotonic raw conversion



On 2023-02-14 5:43 a.m., Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 02:22:39PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
>> The interpoloation is pretty easy to do:
>>
>> do {
>>     start= readtsc();
>>     clock_gett(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, &ts);
>>     end = readtsc();
>>     delta = end-start;
>> } while (delta  > THRESHOLD)   // make sure the reads were not preempted
>> mid = start + (delta +(delta/2))/2; //round-closest
>>
>> and be able to get you a fairly close matching of TSC to
>> CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW value.
>>
>> Once you have that mapping you can take a few samples and establish
>> the linear function.
> 
> Right, this is how we do the TSC calibration in the first place, and if
> NTP can achieve high correctness over a network, then surely we can do
> better locally.
> 
> That is, this scheme should work for all CLOCKs, not only MONOTONIC_RAW.

If I understand correctly, the TSC calibration is done in the kernel.
The kernel keeps updating the mul/shift. We dump the mul/shift into the
perf mmap page for the user tools.

But for the CLOCKs, the mul/shift is kernel internal values which we
don't want to expose to the user space.

If we only apply the scheme in the user space, it brings some observable
 errors based on my test mentioned in the other thread.

Thanks,
Kan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ