[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+vM/KBFNGd+SX9l@google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:03:40 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Report enable_pmu module value when
test is skipped
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023, Like Xu wrote:
> From: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
>
> Running x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test with enable_pmu globally disabled
> will report the following skipping prompt:
> 1..0 # SKIP - Requirement not met: use_intel_pmu() || use_amd_pmu()
> this can be confusing, so add a check on enable_pmu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> index bad7ef8c5b92..070bc8a60a7f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> @@ -771,6 +771,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_FILTER));
> TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS));
>
> + TEST_REQUIRE(get_kvm_param_bool("enable_pmu"));
I think it makes sense to put this at the very top, just in case more requirements
that depend on enable_pmu get added in the future. I can do that when applying.
I'll plan on grabbing this for 6.4.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists