[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cover.1676342827.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:18:05 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, sj@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, shakeelb@...gle.com,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
damon@...ts.linux.dev, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Some cleanups for page isolation
Hi,
The page isolation functions did not return a boolean to indicate
success or not, instead it will return a negative error when failed
to isolate a page. So it's better to check the negative error explicitly
for isolation to make the code more clear per Linus's suggestion in [1].
No functional changes intended in this patch series.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wiBrY+O-4=2mrbVyxR+hOqfdJ=Do6xoucfJ9_5az01L4Q@mail.gmail.com/
Baolin Wang (3):
mm: check negative error of folio_isolate_lru() when failed to isolate
a folio
mm: check negative error of isolate_lru_page() when failed to isolate
a page
mm: mempolicy: check negative error of isolate_hugetlb() when failed
to isolate a hugetlb
mm/damon/paddr.c | 2 +-
mm/gup.c | 2 +-
mm/khugepaged.c | 4 ++--
mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
mm/mempolicy.c | 2 +-
mm/migrate.c | 4 ++--
mm/migrate_device.c | 2 +-
7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists