linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/139] 5.10.168-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c210524a-368d-4249-93f5-6d7ed2a5a173@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:09:55 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/139] 5.10.168-rc1 review

On 2/14/23 09:54, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 9:51 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> Reverting the nvmem patches fixed this problem.
> 
> But upstream is fine?
> 

Yes, this was a bad backport. One of the nvmem patches was missing
from the backport. However, a fix for that missing patch was backported,
causing a double device registration and all kinds of interesting
problems.

Guenter