linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 13/24] sh/cpu: Make sure play

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:28:31 -0800
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To:     Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgross@...e.com,
        richard.henderson@...aro.org, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru,
        mattst88@...il.com, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, guoren@...nel.org,
        linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
        chenhuacai@...nel.org, kernel@...0n.name,
        loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, jiaxun.yang@...goat.com,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
        dalias@...c.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, chris@...kel.net, jcmvbkbc@...il.com,
        linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
        paulmck@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/24] sh/cpu: Make sure play_dead() doesn't return

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 08:57:39AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 14/2/23 08:05, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > play_dead() doesn't return.  Make that more explicit with a BUG().
> > 
> > BUG() is preferable to unreachable() because BUG() is a more explicit
> > failure mode and avoids undefined behavior like falling off the edge of
> > the function into whatever code happens to be next.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >   arch/sh/include/asm/smp-ops.h | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/smp-ops.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/smp-ops.h
> > index e27702130eb6..63866b1595a0 100644
> > --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/smp-ops.h
> > +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/smp-ops.h
> > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static inline void plat_smp_setup(void)
> >   static inline void play_dead(void)
> >   {
> >   	mp_ops->play_dead();
> > +	BUG();
> >   }
> 
> Shouldn't we decorate plat_smp_ops::play_dead() as noreturn first?

I guess it really depends on how far we want to go down the __noreturn
rabbit hole.  To keep the patch set constrained yet still useful I
stopped when I got to a function pointer, as I think it still needs a
BUG() afterwards either way.

That said, there would still be benefits of adding __noreturn to
function pointers, I just wanted to keep the patch set down to a
manageable size ;-)

-- 
Josh