[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72c14e53-bfcb-c444-4b5c-98d07fe648e3@nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:21:37 +0200
From: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" <iuliana.prodan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"S.J. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: add module parameter
to ignore ready flag from remote processor
On 2/14/2023 10:25 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 06:37:44PM +0200, Iuliana Prodan (OSS) wrote:
>> From: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
>>
>> There are cases when we want to test a simple "hello world"
>> application on the DSP and we don't have IPC between the cores.
>> Therefore, do not wait for a confirmation from the remote processor
>> at start.
>>
>> Added "ignore_dsp_ready" flag while inserting the module to ignore
>> remote processor reply after start.
>> By default, this is off - do not ignore reply from rproc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
> This patch is on my review list, as indicated in February 8th's patchset review
> order email. That said, I haven't seen Daniel's RB on the mailing list.
It was given on v4 - please, see here :
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20230119173940.21143-1-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com/#25172596
Powered by blists - more mailing lists