[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276D28B4A4BF8DD3AF1A2828CA29@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:26:25 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@....com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/ioasid: Remove custom IOASID allocator
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 7:46 AM
>
> > > So if a cgroup comes it is just a matter of putting charges in the
> > > right place which is auditable by looking at calls to attach pasid
> > > functions.
> > shouldn't we charge cg during allocation? Or it might be too early for
> > iommufd so we have to wait until attach?
>
> We need to sort this all out. I would expect that iommufd will have an
> allocation API.
>
yes.
btw presumably iommu_global_pasid_ida should be move to iommu.c
since it will be used beyond sva.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists