[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07c870d3-5d98-ca51-5de8-034abc631673@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:49:37 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: nvme boot problems after merge of mm-stable tree into linux-next
On 2/13/23 22:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:01:33 -0800 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> Overall, that suggests that there may have been a change somewhere
>> else in the kernel which is incompatible with a change in one of
>> the mm branches. It is interesting that the problem in next-20230210
>> was seen after the merge of mm-stable, and that it is now seen after
>> the merge of mm-everything.
>
> That could be because I moved some merge resolution fix patches from
> the merge of mm-everything to the merge of mm-stable (they were all for
> conflicts involving commits that are now in mm-stable). So one of my
> merge resolutions could be bad. Or there could be some interaction of
> something in mm-everything (that is not in mm-stable or
> mm-nonmm-stable) that is interacting with some other change in the rest
> of -next.
>
In next-20230210, the crash happened after the merge of mm-stable.
In next-20230213, the crash happens after the merge of mm-everything.
That means both the merge of mm-stable and mm-nonmm-stable are now fine.
So I would suspect that something in the merge of mm-everything
interacts with the rest of -next.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists