linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/17] dt-bindings: power: apple,pmgr-pwrstate: Add t8112 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5ff55f1c-8f02-abec-2320-c2e0b7db8904@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 08:50:11 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>,
        Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>
Cc:     asahi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] dt-bindings: power: apple,pmgr-pwrstate: Add t8112
 compatible

On 14/02/2023 03:24, Hector Martin wrote:
> On 13/02/2023 20.09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/02/2023 16:41, Janne Grunau wrote:
>>> From: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
>>>
>>> Add the apple,t8112-pmgr-pwrstate compatible for the Apple M2 SoC.
>>>
>>> This goes after t8103. The sort order logic here is having SoC numeric
>>> code families in release order, and SoCs within each family in release
>>> order:
>>>
>>> - t8xxx (Apple HxxP/G series, "phone"/"tablet" chips)
>>>   - t8103 (Apple H13G/M1)
>>>   - t8112 (Apple H14G/M2)
>>> - t6xxx (Apple HxxJ series, "desktop" chips)
>>>   - t6000 (Apple H13J(S)/M1 Pro)
>>>   - t6001 (Apple H13J(C)/M1 Max)
>>>   - t6002 (Apple H13J(D)/M1 Ultra)
>>>
>>> Note that t600[0-2] share the t6000 compatible where the hardware is
>>> 100% compatible, which is usually the case in this highly related set
>>> of SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
>>>
>>
>> Missing SoB.
>>
> 
> I'd rather get an r-b, since this is going back into my tree ;)

Please follow Linux process which requires SoB chain.

Best regards,
Krzysztof