[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7626a3c-cf6b-45a2-0342-3bafa8090dcf@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:33:23 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@...too.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: libata-core: Disable READ LOG DMA EXT for Samsung
MZ7LH
On 2/14/23 05:17, Patrick McLean wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 12:11:48 +0900
> Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/11/23 06:51, Patrick McLean wrote:
>>> Samsung MZ7LH drives are spewing messages like this in to dmesg with AMD
>>> SATA controllers:
>>>
>>> ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x7e0000 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
>>> ata1.00: failed command: SEND FPDMA QUEUED
>>> ata1.00: cmd 64/01:88:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 17 ncq dma 512 out
>>> res 40/00:01:01:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask
>>> 0x4 (timeout)
>>>
>>> Since this was seen previously with SSD 840 EVO drives in
>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203475 let's add the same
>>> fix for these drives as the EVOs have, since they likely have very
>>> similar firmwares.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@...too.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>>> index 2ea572628b1c..c4c89d24f84c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>>> @@ -4045,6 +4045,9 @@ static const struct ata_blacklist_entry ata_device_blacklist [] = {
>>> { "Samsung SSD 870*", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM |
>>> ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM |
>>> ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_ATI },
>>> + { "SAMSUNG*MZ7LH*", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM |
>>> + ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM |
>>> + ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_ATI, },
>>> { "FCCT*M500*", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM |
>>> ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM },
>>>
>>
>> Looks OK, but ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_ATI is for PCI vendor ID 1002h. AMD
>> also has vendor ID 1022h. Did you check you adapter vendor ID & tested
>> this patch ?
>
> We tested this patch, and it resolves the problem for us (we have been
> using it for several months).
OK. Thanks for confirming. Will apply in a little while. Thanks !
>
>> --
>> Damien Le Moal
>> Western Digital Research
>>
>
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists