linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] crypto: ccp: Move some PSP mailbox bit definitions into common header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOtMz3PuzpcrqQb-L9kzY1be4xwhp72fqNqSWnRvAE0Nd4d3qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:04:18 +0100
From:   Jan Dąbroś <jsd@...ihalf.com>
To:     Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc:     Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@...ihalf.com>,
        Thomas Rijo-john <Rijo-john.Thomas@....com>,
        Lendacky Thomas <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, John Allen <john.allen@....com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] crypto: ccp: Move some PSP mailbox bit definitions
 into common header

(...)
> @@ -99,7 +93,7 @@ static int psp_check_mbox_recovery(struct psp_mbox __iomem *mbox)
>
>         tmp = readl(&mbox->cmd_fields);
>
> -       return FIELD_GET(PSP_MBOX_FIELDS_RECOVERY, tmp);
> +       return FIELD_GET(PSP_CMDRESP_RECOVERY, tmp);
>  }
>
>  static int psp_wait_cmd(struct psp_mbox __iomem *mbox)
> @@ -107,7 +101,7 @@ static int psp_wait_cmd(struct psp_mbox __iomem *mbox)
>         u32 tmp, expected;
>
>         /* Expect mbox_cmd to be cleared and ready bit to be set by PSP */
> -       expected = FIELD_PREP(PSP_MBOX_FIELDS_READY, 1);
> +       expected = FIELD_PREP(PSP_CMDRESP_RESP, 1);

What's the meaning of "PSP_CMDRESP_RESP"? I see that this new macro
name is currently used by other drivers, but in my opinion "READY" is
more descriptive. (It is also aligned to the comment above this line.)