linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Loongson EIOINTC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:52:58 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Loongson
 EIOINTC

On 13/02/2023 13:15, Binbin Zhou wrote:
> Add Loongson Extended I/O Interrupt controller binding with DT schema
> format using json-schema.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn>
> ---
>  .../loongson,eiointc.yaml                     | 80 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,eiointc.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,eiointc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,eiointc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..88580297f955
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,eiointc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/interrupt-controller/loongson,eiointc.yaml#"
> +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"

Drop quotes from bopth.

> +
> +title: Loongson Extended I/O Interrupt Controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn>
> +
> +description: |
> +  This interrupt controller is found on the Loongson-3 family chips and
> +  Loongson-2K0500 chip and is used to distribute interrupts directly to
> +  individual cores without forwarding them through the HT's interrupt line.
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: /schemas/interrupt-controller.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - loongson,eiointc-1.0

Why not using SoC based compatible? It is preferred.

> +
> +  reg:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 3

You need to describe the items.

> +
> +  interrupt-controller: true
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    description:
> +      Interrupt source of the CPU interrupts.

You need to describe the items.

> +
> +  interrupt-names:
> +    description:
> +      List of names for the parent interrupts.

Drop description.

> +    items:
> +      - const: int0
> +
> +  '#interrupt-cells':
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  'loongson,eio-num-vecs':

Drop quotes.

> +    description:
> +      The number of devices supported by the extended I/O interrupt vector.

Why this cannot be inferred from the compatible? Different boards with
the same SoC support different devices?

> +    $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"

Drop quotes.

> +    minimum: 1
> +    maximum: 256
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - interrupts
> +  - interrupt-controller
> +  - '#interrupt-cells'
> +  - 'loongson,eio-num-vecs'
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    eiointc: interrupt-controller@...11600 {
> +      compatible = "loongson,eiointc-1.0";
> +      reg = <0x1fe11600 0x8
> +             0x1fe11700 0x8
> +             0x1fe11800 0x8>;

That's not correct syntax. <>, <>, <>

> +
> +      interrupt-controller;
> +      #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> +
> +      interrupt-parent = <&cpuintc>;
> +      interrupts = <3>;
> +      interrupt-names = "int0";
> +
> +      loongson,eio-num-vecs = <128>;
> +

Drop stray blank line.

> +    };
> +
> +...

Best regards,
Krzysztof