linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for Crashdump collection on IPQ9574

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d77f5ad1-edb6-c814-b296-8e9dc622d953@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:26:05 +0530
From:   POOVENDHAN SELVARAJ <quic_poovendh@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <lee@...nel.org>,
        <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        <will@...nel.org>, <shawnguo@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
        <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>, <robimarko@...il.com>,
        <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
        <broonie@...nel.org>, <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com>, <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_arajkuma@...cinc.com>, <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for Crashdump
 collection on IPQ9574


On 2/14/2023 3:14 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/02/2023 10:35, POOVENDHAN SELVARAJ wrote:
>>>>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a73-pmu";
>>>>> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
>>   >>> @@ -95,11 +102,17 @@
>>>>> #address-cells = <2>;
>>>>> #size-cells = <2>;
>>>>> ranges;
>> *>>> -*
>>   >> I don't think anything improved here - still unrelated change.
>>   >>
>>
>> Are you referring to the deleted line here?
> Yes, the line removal does not seem related nor justified.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Thanks... will address this.

Regards,
Poovendhan S