[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230214104049.1553059-3-steen.hegelund@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:40:41 +0100
From: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Casper Andersson" <casper.casan@...il.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@...o.com>,
"Nathan Huckleberry" <nhuck@...gle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Steen Hegelund" <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 02/10] net: microchip: sparx5: Clear rule counter even if lookup is disabled
The rule counter must be cleared when creating a new rule, even if the VCAP
lookup is currently disabled.
This ensures that rules located in VCAPs that use external counters (such
as Sparx5 IS2 and ES0) will have their counter reset even if the VCAP
lookup is not enabled at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>
Fixes: 95fa74148daa ("net: microchip: sparx5: Reset VCAP counter for new rules")
---
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c | 7 +++++--
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c
index 6307d59f23da..68e04d47f6fd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c
@@ -2246,6 +2246,11 @@ int vcap_add_rule(struct vcap_rule *rule)
if (move.count > 0)
vcap_move_rules(ri, &move);
+ /* Set the counter to zero */
+ ret = vcap_write_counter(ri, &ctr);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
if (ri->state == VCAP_RS_DISABLED) {
/* Erase the rule area */
ri->vctrl->ops->init(ri->ndev, ri->admin, ri->addr, ri->size);
@@ -2264,8 +2269,6 @@ int vcap_add_rule(struct vcap_rule *rule)
pr_err("%s:%d: rule write error: %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, ret);
goto out;
}
- /* Set the counter to zero */
- ret = vcap_write_counter(ri, &ctr);
out:
mutex_unlock(&ri->admin->lock);
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
index b2753aac8ad2..0a1d4d740567 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
@@ -1337,8 +1337,8 @@ static void vcap_api_encode_rule_test(struct kunit *test)
u32 port_mask_rng_mask = 0x0f;
u32 igr_port_mask_value = 0xffabcd01;
u32 igr_port_mask_mask = ~0;
- /* counter is written as the last operation */
- u32 expwriteaddr[] = {792, 793, 794, 795, 796, 797, 792};
+ /* counter is written as the first operation */
+ u32 expwriteaddr[] = {792, 792, 793, 794, 795, 796, 797};
int idx;
vcap_test_api_init(&is2_admin);
--
2.39.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists