[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+tmEpvr5tky+YbY@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:44:34 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Mirela Rabulea <mirela.rabulea@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Ming Qian <ming.qian@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: imx-jpeg: avoid array overflow
Hi Arnd,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> gcc-9 (unlike newer versions) reports a possible array overflow
> in mxc_jpeg_dec_irq():
>
> drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx-jpeg/mxc-jpeg.c: In function 'mxc_jpeg_dec_irq':
> drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx-jpeg/mxc-jpeg.c:641:28: error: array subscript 2 is above array bounds of 'u32[2]' {aka 'unsigned int[2]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
> 641 | size += q_data->sizeimage[i];
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
> drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx-jpeg/mxc-jpeg.c:641:28: error: array subscript 3 is above array bounds of 'u32[2]' {aka 'unsigned int[2]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
>
> The compiler clearly deduces that fmt->mem_planes is at least '2' if
> this code line is reached, and that fmt->comp_planes must be at least
> one more for the loop to make sense. However, this does not actually
> seem to be the case in the initialized values, so I would guess that
> this part of the function is never reached in practice.
>
> As a workaround, add a compile-time condition that skips any out-of-range
> array indices.
>
> Fixes: ccc9f1db9c6b ("media: imx-jpeg: Support contiguous and non contiguous format")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx-jpeg/mxc-jpeg.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx-jpeg/mxc-jpeg.c b/drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx-jpeg/mxc-jpeg.c
> index f085f14d676a..7a667bfc2424 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx-jpeg/mxc-jpeg.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx-jpeg/mxc-jpeg.c
> @@ -638,7 +638,8 @@ static u32 mxc_jpeg_get_plane_size(struct mxc_jpeg_q_data *q_data, u32 plane_no)
>
> size = q_data->sizeimage[fmt->mem_planes - 1];
> for (i = fmt->mem_planes; i < fmt->comp_planes; i++)
> - size += q_data->sizeimage[i];
> + if (i < MXC_JPEG_MAX_PLANES)
> + size += q_data->sizeimage[i];
There's a risk someone will try to optimize this later, realizing that
the check isn't needed, and we'll get the warning back. A comment would
thus be useful.
Also, how about writing it as
for (i = fmt->mem_planes; i < min(fmt->comp_planes, MXC_JPEG_MAX_PLANES); i++)
size += q_data->sizeimage[i];
>
> return size;
> }
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists