[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+toXAUa2Cbwn7I0@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 02:54:20 -0800
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] iommufd/device: Use iommu_group_replace_domain()
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:49:34AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 11:48:30PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
>
> > What about point 1? If dev2 and dev3 are already replaced when
> > doing iommu_group_replace_domain() on dev1, their idev objects
> > still have the old hwpt/iopt until user space does another two
> > IOCTLs on them, right?
>
> We have a complicated model for multi-device groups...
>
> The first device in the group to change domains must move all the
> devices in the group
>
> But userspace is still expected to run through and change all the
> other devices
>
> So replace should be a NOP if the group is already linked to the right
> domain.
>
> This patch needs to make sure that incosistency in the view betwen the
> iommu_group and the iommufd model doesn't cause a functional
> problem.
Yea, I was thinking that we'd need to block any access to the
idev->hwpt of a pending device's, before the kernel finishes
the "NOP" IOCTL from userspace, maybe with a helper:
(iommu_get_domain_for_dev(idev->dev) != idev->hwpt->domain)
Thanks
Nic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists