lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33e2515b-1d37-aa90-835f-fffbb4296779@microchip.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:07:29 +0000
From:   <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
To:     <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] pinctrl: at91: Use dev_err_probe() instead of
 custom messaging

On 13.02.2023 17:45, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> The custom message has no value except printing the error code,
> the same does dev_err_probe(). Let's use the latter for the sake
> of unification.
> 
> Note that some APIs already have messaging in them and some simply
> do not require the current noise.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Tested-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>

> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 64 +++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> index 055a88b2dacc..08f88403affb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> @@ -1294,10 +1294,11 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
>  static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
>                                  struct at91_pinctrl *info)
>  {
> +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>         int ret = 0;
>         int i, j, ngpio_chips_enabled = 0;
>         uint32_t *tmp;
> -       struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +       struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>         struct device_node *child;
> 
>         if (!np)
> @@ -1360,9 +1361,8 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
>                         continue;
>                 ret = at91_pinctrl_parse_functions(child, info, i++);
>                 if (ret) {
> -                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to parse function\n");
>                         of_node_put(child);
> -                       return ret;
> +                       return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to parse function\n");
>                 }
>         }
> 
> @@ -1415,11 +1415,8 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
>         info->pctl = devm_pinctrl_register(&pdev->dev, &at91_pinctrl_desc,
>                                            info);
> -
> -       if (IS_ERR(info->pctl)) {
> -               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register AT91 pinctrl driver\n");
> -               return PTR_ERR(info->pctl);
> -       }
> +       if (IS_ERR(info->pctl))
> +               return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(info->pctl), "could not register AT91 pinctrl driver\n");
> 
>         /* We will handle a range of GPIO pins */
>         for (i = 0; i < gpio_banks; i++)
> @@ -1820,39 +1817,28 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         char **names;
> 
>         BUG_ON(alias_idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_chips));
> -       if (gpio_chips[alias_idx]) {
> -               ret = -EBUSY;
> -               goto err;
> -       }
> +       if (gpio_chips[alias_idx])
> +               return dev_err_probe(dev, -EBUSY, "%d slot is occupied.\n", alias_idx);
> 
>         irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -       if (irq < 0) {
> -               ret = irq;
> -               goto err;
> -       }
> +       if (irq < 0)
> +               return irq;
> 
>         at91_chip = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*at91_chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> -       if (!at91_chip) {
> -               ret = -ENOMEM;
> -               goto err;
> -       }
> +       if (!at91_chip)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> 
>         at91_chip->regbase = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> -       if (IS_ERR(at91_chip->regbase)) {
> -               ret = PTR_ERR(at91_chip->regbase);
> -               goto err;
> -       }
> +       if (IS_ERR(at91_chip->regbase))
> +               return PTR_ERR(at91_chip->regbase);
> 
>         at91_chip->ops = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>         at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq;
>         at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx;
> 
>         at91_chip->clock = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> -       if (IS_ERR(at91_chip->clock)) {
> -               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get clock, ignoring.\n");
> -               ret = PTR_ERR(at91_chip->clock);
> -               goto err;
> -       }
> +       if (IS_ERR(at91_chip->clock))
> +               return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(at91_chip->clock), "failed to get clock, ignoring.\n");
> 
>         at91_chip->chip = at91_gpio_template;
>         at91_chip->id = alias_idx;
> @@ -1865,17 +1851,15 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 
>         if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "#gpio-lines", &ngpio)) {
>                 if (ngpio >= MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK)
> -                       pr_err("at91_gpio.%d, gpio-nb >= %d failback to %d\n",
> -                              alias_idx, MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK, MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK);
> +                       dev_err(dev, "at91_gpio.%d, gpio-nb >= %d failback to %d\n",
> +                               alias_idx, MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK, MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK);
>                 else
>                         chip->ngpio = ngpio;
>         }
> 
>         names = devm_kasprintf_strarray(dev, "pio", chip->ngpio);
> -       if (!names) {
> -               ret = -ENOMEM;
> -               goto err;
> -       }
> +       if (!names)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> 
>         for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++)
>                 strreplace(names[i], '-', alias_idx + 'A');
> @@ -1892,11 +1876,11 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 
>         ret = at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(pdev, at91_chip);
>         if (ret)
> -               goto gpiochip_add_err;
> +               return ret;
> 
>         ret = gpiochip_add_data(chip, at91_chip);
>         if (ret)
> -               goto gpiochip_add_err;
> +               return ret;
> 
>         gpio_chips[alias_idx] = at91_chip;
>         platform_set_drvdata(pdev, at91_chip);
> @@ -1905,12 +1889,6 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         dev_info(&pdev->dev, "at address %p\n", at91_chip->regbase);
> 
>         return 0;
> -
> -gpiochip_add_err:
> -err:
> -       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failure %i for GPIO %i\n", ret, alias_idx);
> -
> -       return ret;
>  }
> 
>  static const struct dev_pm_ops at91_gpio_pm_ops = {
> --
> 2.39.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ