[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230214122841.13066-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:28:40 +0100
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
To: david@...hat.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, thuth@...hat.com,
imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/1] KVM: s390: vsie: clarifications on setting the APCB
Hi,
This is a v3 of the previously called:
[PATCH] KVM: s390: vsie: fix crycb virtual vs physical usage
and
[PATCH v2 0/1] KVM: s390: vsie: clarifications on setting the APCB
Changes:
1->2 After David's comment that the patch has not to do with
virtual vs physical, I reworked the commit message.
2->3 rename crycb_o crycb_gpa and apcb_o apcb_gpa
gpa = Guest Physical Address
I resent the patch because I think that even the previous
version is not really buggy, this new version brings clarity.
Regards,
Pierre
Pierre Morel (1):
KVM: s390: vsie: clarifications on setting the APCB
arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists