[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0df35d66-d5c8-aa71-af14-d9550aa4f1e8@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:46:18 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] soc: qcom: Make the Qualcomm UFS/SDCC ICE a
dedicated driver
On 14/02/2023 13:02, Abel Vesa wrote:
> This takes the already existing duplicated support in both ufs-qcom
> and sdhci-msm drivers and makes it a dedicated driver that can be used
> by both mentioned drivers. The reason for this is because, staring with
> SM8550, the ICE IP block is shared between UFS and SDCC, which means we
> need to probe a dedicated device and share it between those two
> consumers. So let's add the ICE dedicated driver as a soc driver.
To clarify - missing binding, thus NAK for the patch going with out it.
It's not a NAK of course for the code itself.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists