[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77ff2776d99286eac6eefecb1903b96899d0ff62.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:13:44 +0100
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@...c27.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Retire IA64/Itanium support
On Wed, 2023-02-15 at 12:08 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> But when it's actively known to be broken and nobody has time or
> interest to look at it, at that point the "it doesn't look any more
> painful than other architectures" becomes kind of moot.
Let me look after it in the weekend and let's see whether we can unbreak
it. I don't think there is really a big issue. The last time we had a
similar issue was the regression introduced by 974b9b2c68f3 which got fixed
with the simple fix in bd05220c7be3.
It's probably similarly trivial to fix the current regression.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists