[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b22740d-6cd4-2485-7a26-c73c8bb6be27@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:23:05 +0530
From: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
dyoung@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
robh@...nel.org, efault@....de, rppt@...nel.org, david@...hat.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 5/7] kexec: exclude hot remove cpu from elfcorehdr
notes
On 13/02/23 18:22, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13 2023 at 10:10, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>> The sysconf document says _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF is processors configured,
>> isn't that equivalent to possible CPUs?
> glibc tries to evaluate that in the following order:
>
> 1) /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*
>
> That's present CPUs not possible CPUs
>
> 2) /proc/stat
>
> That's online CPUs
>
> 3) sched_getaffinity()
>
> That's online CPUs at best. In the worst case it's an affinity mask
> which is set on a process group
Thanks for the clarification Thomas.
- Sourabh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists