linux-kernel - [RESEND PATCH 08/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230215070400.5901-9-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:33:56 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     andersson@...nel.org
Cc:     konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 08/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs

Qualcomm platforms making use of CPUFreq HW Engine (EPSS/OSM) supply clocks
to the CPU cores. But this relationship is not represented in DTS so far.

So let's make cpufreq node as the clock provider and CPU nodes as the
consumers. The clock index for each CPU node is based on the frequency
domain index.

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
index fd20096cfc6e..693d023d2629 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ CPU0: cpu@0 {
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			compatible = "qcom,kryo485";
 			reg = <0x0 0x0>;
+			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <488>;
 			dynamic-power-coefficient = <232>;
@@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ CPU1: cpu@100 {
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			compatible = "qcom,kryo485";
 			reg = <0x0 0x100>;
+			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <488>;
 			dynamic-power-coefficient = <232>;
@@ -97,6 +99,7 @@ CPU2: cpu@200 {
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			compatible = "qcom,kryo485";
 			reg = <0x0 0x200>;
+			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <488>;
 			dynamic-power-coefficient = <232>;
@@ -119,6 +122,7 @@ CPU3: cpu@300 {
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			compatible = "qcom,kryo485";
 			reg = <0x0 0x300>;
+			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <488>;
 			dynamic-power-coefficient = <232>;
@@ -141,6 +145,7 @@ CPU4: cpu@400 {
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			compatible = "qcom,kryo485";
 			reg = <0x0 0x400>;
+			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
 			dynamic-power-coefficient = <369>;
@@ -163,6 +168,7 @@ CPU5: cpu@500 {
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			compatible = "qcom,kryo485";
 			reg = <0x0 0x500>;
+			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
 			dynamic-power-coefficient = <369>;
@@ -185,6 +191,7 @@ CPU6: cpu@600 {
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			compatible = "qcom,kryo485";
 			reg = <0x0 0x600>;
+			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
 			dynamic-power-coefficient = <369>;
@@ -207,6 +214,7 @@ CPU7: cpu@700 {
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			compatible = "qcom,kryo485";
 			reg = <0x0 0x700>;
+			clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 2>;
 			enable-method = "psci";
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
 			dynamic-power-coefficient = <421>;
@@ -4273,6 +4281,7 @@ cpufreq_hw: cpufreq@...23000 {
 			clock-names = "xo", "alternate";
 
 			#freq-domain-cells = <1>;
+			#clock-cells = <1>;
 		};
 
 		lmh_cluster1: lmh@...50800 {
-- 
2.25.1