[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f607214d-6ad3-7475-0d3c-76268893aaf5@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:17:28 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@...il.com>
Cc: alberto.dassatti@...g-vd.ch, xxm@...k-chips.com,
rick.wertenbroek@...g-vd.ch, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Mikko Kovanen <mikko.kovanen@...amobile.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] PCI: rockchip: Remove writes to unused registers
On 2/15/23 18:04, Rick Wertenbroek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 12:56 AM Damien Le Moal
> <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com> wrote:
>>
>> I checked the TRM and indeed these registers are listed as unused.
>> However, with this patch, nothing work for me using a Pine rockpro64
>> board. Keeping this patch, your series (modulo some other fixes, more
>> emails coming) is making things work !
>
> Hello, Thank you for testing the driver and commenting, I'll incorporate your
> suggestions in the next version of this series.
>
> This patch alone does not make the driver work. Without the fixes to the
> address windows and translation found in [PATCH v2 6/9] ("PCI: rockchip:
> Fix window mapping and address translation for endpoint") transfers will not
> work. However, as you said, with the patch series, the driver works.
> Good to see that you have the driver working on the rockpro64 which is a
> very similar but different board than the one I used (FriendlyElec NanoPC-T4).
>
>> So I think the bug is with the TRM, not the code. THinking logically about
>> htis, it makes sense: this is programming the address translation unit to
>> translate mmio & dma between host PCI address and local CPU space address.
>> If we never set the PU address, how can that unit possibly ever translate
>> anything ?
>
> No, the bug is not in the TRM:
> The RK3399 PCIe endpoint core has the physical address space of 64MB
> @ 0xF800'0000 to access the PCIe address space (TRM 17.5.4).
> This space is split into 33 windows, one of 32MBytes and 32 of 1MByte.
> Read-write accesses by the CPU to that region will be translated. Each
> window has a mapping that is configured through the ATR Configuration
> Register Address Map (TRM 17.6.8) and the registers addr0 and addr1
> will dictate the translation between the window (a physical CPU addr)
> into a PCI space address (with this the unit can translate). The other
> registers are for the PCIe header descriptor.
> The translation process is documented in TRM 17.5.5.1.1
> The core will translate all read-write accesses to the windows that fall
> in the 64MB space @ 0xF800'0000 and generate the PCIe addresses
> and headers according to the values in the registers in the ATR
> Configuration Register Address Map (@ 0xFDC0'0000).
>
> Translation does indeed take place and works
> but requires the changes in [PATCH v2 6/9] ("PCI: rockchip:
> Fix window mapping and address translation for endpoint")
> because it was broken from the start...
>
> The two writes that were removed are to unused (read-only) registers.
> The writes don't do anything, manually writing and reading back these
> addresses will always lead to 0 (they are read-only). So they are removed.
OK. I tried so many things to get something working that I probably got
confused with this one :) Let me retry with this patch 1 to see if I get
the same results, which is: pci-epf-test solidly working (with the patches
I sent earlier today), and my on-going nvme epf driver working-ish (BIOS
OK, but IRQs to Linux miserably failing to be sent from EP).
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists