linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "venus: firmware: Correct non-pix start and end addresses"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFOAJEdBbzqkGVqw+vgNYNxyaTHwvjFyskTwjycP820L2tOctA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:57:38 +0100
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc:     Vikash Garodia <vgarodia@....qualcomm.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mka@...omium.org" <mka@...omium.org>,
        Albert Esteve <aesteve@...hat.com>,
        "stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org" <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetb@...hat.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
        "Vikash Garodia (QUIC)" <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
        "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fritz Koenig <frkoenig@...gle.com>,
        "Dikshita Agarwal (QUIC)" <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
        "Rajeshwar Kurapaty (QUIC)" <quic_rkurapat@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "venus: firmware: Correct non-pix start and end addresses"

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:53 AM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
Leemhuis) <regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
>
> On 11.02.23 15:27, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> > On 10.02.23 11:07, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> On 2/10/23 10:22, Vikash Garodia wrote:
> >>
> >>>> So what should we do about this folks? Since not allowing the driver to probe on
> >>>> at least SC7180 is a quite serious regression, can we revert for now until a proper
> >>>> fix is figured out?
> >>>
> >>> I am able to repro this issue on sc7180 and discussing with firmware team on the cause
> >>> of reset failure. The original patch was raised for fixing rare SMMU faults during warm
> >>> boot of video hardware. Hence looking to understand the regressing part before we
> >>> proceed to revert.
> >>
> >> Great, if you are working on a proper fix then that would be much better indeed.
> >
> > Yeah, that's great, but OTOH: there is almost certainly just one week
> > before 6.2 will be released. Ideally this should be fixed by then.
> > Vikash, do you think that's in the cards? If not: why not revert this
> > now to make sure 6.2 works fine?
>
> Hmm, no reply. And we meanwhile have Wednesday and 6.2 is almost
> certainly going to be out on Sunday. And the problem was called "a quite
> serious regression" above. So why not quickly fix this with the revert,
> as proposed earlier?
>
> Vikash? Javier?
>

I agree with you, that we should land this revert and then properly
fix the page fault issue in v6.3.

But it's not my call, the v4l2/media folks have to decide that.

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat