linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/3] x86/kprobes: Fix arch_check_optimized_kprobe check within optimized

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230215115430.236046-4-yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:54:30 +0800
From:   Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
To:     <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
        <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
        <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>, <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <mhiramat@...nel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>,
        <peterz@...radead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] x86/kprobes: Fix arch_check_optimized_kprobe check within optimized_kprobe range

When arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe calculating jump destination address,
it copies original instructions from jmp-optimized kprobe (see
__recover_optprobed_insn), and calculated based on length of original
instruction.

arch_check_optimized_kprobe does not check KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMATED when
checking whether jmp-optimized kprobe exists.
As a result, setup_detour_execution may jump to a range that has been
overwritten by jump destination address, resulting in an inval opcode error.

For example, assume that register two kprobes whose addresses are
<func+9> and <func+11> in "func" function.
The original code of "func" function is as follows:

   0xffffffff816cb5e9 <+9>:     push   %r12
   0xffffffff816cb5eb <+11>:    xor    %r12d,%r12d
   0xffffffff816cb5ee <+14>:    test   %rdi,%rdi
   0xffffffff816cb5f1 <+17>:    setne  %r12b
   0xffffffff816cb5f5 <+21>:    push   %rbp

1.Register the kprobe for <func+11>, assume that is kp1, corresponding optimized_kprobe is op1.
  After the optimization, "func" code changes to:

   0xffffffff816cc079 <+9>:     push   %r12
   0xffffffff816cc07b <+11>:    jmp    0xffffffffa0210000
   0xffffffff816cc080 <+16>:    incl   0xf(%rcx)
   0xffffffff816cc083 <+19>:    xchg   %eax,%ebp
   0xffffffff816cc084 <+20>:    (bad)
   0xffffffff816cc085 <+21>:    push   %rbp

Now op1->flags == KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMATED;

2. Register the kprobe for <func+9>, assume that is kp2, corresponding optimized_kprobe is op2.

register_kprobe(kp2)
  register_aggr_kprobe
    alloc_aggr_kprobe
      __prepare_optimized_kprobe
        arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe
          __recover_optprobed_insn    // copy original bytes from kp1->optinsn.copied_insn,
                                      // jump address = <func+14>

3. disable kp1:

disable_kprobe(kp1)
  __disable_kprobe
    ...
    if (p == orig_p || aggr_kprobe_disabled(orig_p)) {
      ret = disarm_kprobe(orig_p, true)       // add op1 in unoptimizing_list, not unoptimized
      orig_p->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;  // op1->flags ==  KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMATED | KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED
    ...

4. unregister kp2
__unregister_kprobe_top
  ...
  if (!kprobe_disabled(ap) && !kprobes_all_disarmed) {
    optimize_kprobe(op)
      ...
      if (arch_check_optimized_kprobe(op) < 0) // because op1 has KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED, here not return
        return;
      p->kp.flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED;   //  now op2 has KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED
  }

"func" code now is:

   0xffffffff816cc079 <+9>:     int3
   0xffffffff816cc07a <+10>:    push   %rsp
   0xffffffff816cc07b <+11>:    jmp    0xffffffffa0210000
   0xffffffff816cc080 <+16>:    incl   0xf(%rcx)
   0xffffffff816cc083 <+19>:    xchg   %eax,%ebp
   0xffffffff816cc084 <+20>:    (bad)
   0xffffffff816cc085 <+21>:    push   %rbp

5. if call "func", int3 handler call setup_detour_execution:

  if (p->flags & KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED) {
    ...
    regs->ip = (unsigned long)op->optinsn.insn + TMPL_END_IDX;
    ...
  }

The code for the destination address is

   0xffffffffa021072c:  push   %r12
   0xffffffffa021072e:  xor    %r12d,%r12d
   0xffffffffa0210731:  jmp    0xffffffff816cb5ee <func+14>

However, <func+14> is not a valid start instruction address. As a result, an error occurs.

Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
index 3718d6863555..e6d9bd038401 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ int arch_check_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
 
 	for (i = 1; i < op->optinsn.size; i++) {
 		p = get_kprobe(op->kp.addr + i);
-		if (p && !kprobe_disabled(p))
+		if (p && (!kprobe_disabled(p) || kprobe_optimized(p)))
 			return -EEXIST;
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.GIT