[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3057147.1676467076@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:17:56 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
syzbot+a440341a59e3b7142895@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 01/12] splice: Fix O_DIRECT file read splice to avoid reversion of ITER_PIPE
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> > + pages = (void *)(bv + npages);
>
> I think this cast should be to struct page **… not void *.
Yeah. Doesn't change anything functionally, though, I think.
> > + /* Free any pages that didn't get touched at all. */
> > + reclaim /= PAGE_SIZE;
>
> Any reason not to keep reclaim in PAGE_SIZE units to start with?
Probably not, but I don't want to fiddle with that right now. I can send a
follow up patch for it.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists