linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom,apcs-kpss-global: drop mbox-names from example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLdrpwJ4VhH4MK+RDjZZtWWosXOC48yW+STwtJR6QCAjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:09:28 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...cinc.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom,apcs-kpss-global: drop
 mbox-names from example

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 4:16 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Qualcomm G-Link RPM edge bindings do not allow and do not use mbox-names
> property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> 1. None.
> 2. Previously was sent as separate patch.
>
> There are no strict dependencies. This can go anytime. The next patch
> (glink-rpm-edge) should be applied in the same or later cycle (could be
> via different trees).

Except that without this patch there is now a warning in linux-next.

Rob