[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YSdXWcM_WO8FNNAs_sy=d=dwd7Ox9Aayucu9hgJ9BLhHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:59:22 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/isolation: Fix illegal CPU value by
housekeeping_any_cpu() return
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 6:55 PM Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> For kernels built with CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, running the following tests:
>
[...]
> This commit therefore add checks for cpumask_any_and() return values
> in housekeeping_any_cpu(), if cpumask_any_and() returns an illegal CPU
> value, the housekeeping_any_cpu() will return current CPU number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/isolation.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> index 373d42c707bc..534397ab7a36 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,11 @@ int housekeeping_any_cpu(enum hk_type type)
> if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
> return cpu;
>
> - return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], cpu_online_mask);
> + cpu = cpumask_any_and(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], cpu_online_mask);
> + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> + return smp_processor_id();
> + else
> + return cpu;
Nit: no need of "else", simply:
return (cpu >= nr_cpuids ? smp_processor_id() : cpu);
or
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
return smp_processor_id();
return cpu;
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists