[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf7eae6b-61ea-accb-f981-023fb022919c@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 23:07:00 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: yonggil.song@...sung.com,
"jaegeuk@...nel.org" <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Seokhwan Kim <sukka.kim@...sung.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] f2fs: fix uninitialized skipped_gc_rwsem
On 2023/2/15 10:48, Yonggil Song wrote:
> When f2fs skipped a gc round during victim migration, there was a bug which
> would skip all upcoming gc rounds unconditionally because skipped_gc_rwsem
> was not initialized. It fixes the bug by correctly initializing the
> skipped_gc_rwsem inside the gc loop.
It makes sense to me.
>
> Fixes: d147ea4adb96 ("f2fs: introduce f2fs_gc_control to consolidate f2fs_gc parameters")
How does this commits introduce the bug?
Thanks,
> Signed-off-by: Yonggil Song <yonggil.song@...sung.com>
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index b22f49a6f128..81d326abaac1 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -1786,8 +1786,8 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_gc_control *gc_control)
> prefree_segments(sbi));
>
> cpc.reason = __get_cp_reason(sbi);
> - sbi->skipped_gc_rwsem = 0;
> gc_more:
> + sbi->skipped_gc_rwsem = 0;
> if (unlikely(!(sbi->sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE))) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto stop;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists