linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/21] KVM: x86/pmu: Zero out LBR capabilities during PMU refresh

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y+z2+5HPTRAa7+5i@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:17:13 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/21] KVM: x86/pmu: Zero out LBR capabilities during
 PMU refresh

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023, Like Xu wrote:
> On 10/2/2023 8:31 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Note, this is a very theoretical bug, there is no known use case where a
> > VMM would deliberately enable the vPMU via KVM_SET_CPUID2, and then later
> > disable the vPMU.
> 
> That's why we're getting more and more comfortable with selftests
> and fuzz testing on KVM interfaces. So is there a test for this ?

Yep, last patch in the series, "KVM: selftests: Verify LBRs are disabled if vPMU
is disabled".