[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegtZXM7mOLbmc+si42iux+7E313QnRryztwT=U3g5Lqirw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 16:32:29 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 05/17] overlayfs: Implement splice-read
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 16:04, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>
> > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > + if (in->f_flags & O_DIRECT &&
> > > + !(real.file->f_mode & FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT))
> > > + goto out_fdput;
> >
> > This is unnecessary, as it was already done in ovl_real_fdget() ->
> > ovl_real_fdget_meta() -> ovl_change_flags().
>
> Does that mean ovl_read_iter() and ovl_write_iter() shouldn't be doing it,
> then?
That's a different thing, because ovl_*_iter() are checking on
ki->flags, not f_flags.
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists