linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kprobes: Fixed probe nodes not correctly removed when forcibly unoptimized

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <94ffd94f-23b6-8d11-43c5-cd5ff16cac65@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 10:52:00 +0800
From:   Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
To:     "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
CC:     <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
        <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
        <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>, <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <ast@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kprobes: Fixed probe nodes not correctly removed when
 forcibly unoptimized

Hello Masami,

On 2023/2/15 22:55, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> Hi Yang,
> 
> Thanks for reporting, but maybe this is a part of following fix.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/167448024501.3253718.13037333683110512967.stgit@devnote3/
> 
> Can you confirm that fixes the same issue?
Yes, I've tested and confirmed that the patch you mentioned above fixes 
the same issue.

Will remove it in next version.

Thanks
Yang.