[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+5bGS9clWPS+B5J@krava>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:34:33 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] perf record: Record dropped sample count
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:32:14PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 05:23:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 09:04:49PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > @@ -1929,12 +1923,27 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
> > >
> > > for (int x = 0; x < xyarray__max_x(xy); x++) {
> > > for (int y = 0; y < xyarray__max_y(xy); y++) {
> > > - __record__read_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost, x, y);
> > > + struct perf_counts_values count;
> > > +
> > > + if (perf_evsel__read(&evsel->core, x, y, &count) < 0) {
> > > + pr_err("read LOST count failed\n");
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (count.lost) {
> > > + __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost,
> > > + x, y, count.lost, 0);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > > }
> > > +
> > > + lost_count = perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(evsel);
> > > + if (lost_count)
> > > + __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost, 0, 0, lost_count,
> > > + PERF_RECORD_MISC_LOST_SAMPLES_BPF);
> >
> > hi,
> > I can't see PERF_RECORD_MISC_LOST_SAMPLES_BPF in the tip/perf/core so can't compile,
> > what do I miss?
>
> Humm, but you shouldn't need kernel headers to build tools/perf/, right?
right, should be also in tools/include headers
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists