[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+5g6Hjm9oxRjwJX@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:59:20 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>,
Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] x86/sev: Change snp_guest_issue_request()'s fw_err
argument
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:46:02PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> @@ -390,18 +390,16 @@ static int __handle_guest_request(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, u64 exit_code,
> goto retry_request;
> }
>
> - if (fw_err)
> - *fw_err = override_err ?: err;
> -
As Tom pointed out offlist, we still need to do the error override.
Frankly, I'm not crazy about this request retrying as we do it but
I guess it is what it is and it is too late to change that now.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists