[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+6Rc8RUiv7xAlKH@x1n>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:26:27 -0500
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kernel@...labora.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm/userfaultfd: add VM_WARN_ONCE()
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 02:48:51PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> On 2/16/23 2:24 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 16.02.23 10:16, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> >> Add VM_WARN_ONCE() to uffd_wp_range() to detect range (start, len) abuse.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
> >> ---
> >> mm/userfaultfd.c | 2 ++
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
> >> index 77c5839e591c..d89ed44d2668 100644
> >> --- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
> >> +++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
> >> @@ -717,6 +717,8 @@ long uffd_wp_range(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct
> >> vm_area_struct *dst_vma,
> >> struct mmu_gather tlb;
> >> long ret;
> >> + VM_WARN_ONCE(start < dst_vma->vm_start || start + len >
> >> dst_vma->vm_end,
> >> + "The address range exceeds VMA boundary.\n");
> >
> > VM_WARN_ON_ONCE is sufficient (sorry for spelling out the wrong variant
> > earlier).
> Will do in the next version. Thanks.
Shall we just squash the two patches?
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists