[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230216051750.3125598-30-surenb@google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 21:17:44 -0800
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: michel@...pinasse.org, jglisse@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
dave@...olabs.net, willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com, paulmck@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org,
songliubraving@...com, peterx@...hat.com, david@...hat.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, punit.agrawal@...edance.com,
lstoakes@...il.com, peterjung1337@...il.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
chriscli@...gle.com, axelrasmussen@...gle.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
minchan@...gle.com, rppt@...nel.org, jannh@...gle.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, tatashin@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
gthelen@...gle.com, gurua@...gle.com, arjunroy@...gle.com,
soheil@...gle.com, leewalsh@...gle.com, posk@...gle.com,
michalechner92@...glemail.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 29/35] mm: prevent userfaults to be handled under per-vma lock
Due to the possibility of handle_userfault dropping mmap_lock, avoid fault
handling under VMA lock and retry holding mmap_lock. This can be handled
more gracefully in the future.
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 555612d153ad..751aebc1b29f 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -5254,6 +5254,15 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
if (!vma_start_read(vma))
goto inval;
+ /*
+ * Due to the possibility of userfault handler dropping mmap_lock, avoid
+ * it for now and fall back to page fault handling under mmap_lock.
+ */
+ if (userfaultfd_armed(vma)) {
+ vma_end_read(vma);
+ goto inval;
+ }
+
/* Check since vm_start/vm_end might change before we lock the VMA */
if (unlikely(address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end)) {
vma_end_read(vma);
--
2.39.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists