linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: omap: add phytec pcm-049 som and pcm-959 dev board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y+3Sbnau5qtmFabI@atomide.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:51:26 +0200
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        soc@...nel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: omap: add phytec pcm-049 som
 and pcm-959 dev board

* Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com> [230215 16:46]:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 09:14:43AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> [230209 19:35]:
> > > OMAP maintainers, if no one is going to convert all of omap.txt over to 
> > > schema, can we at least start an empty schema and add to it instead of 
> > > here...
> > 
> > That sounds like a good plan to me as it allows moving one device at a
> > time.
> > 
> > Colin, care to add the initial yaml binding file with your board?
> 
> I'll give it a go. To be clear, this would be
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap.yaml and it would
> include my device? I'm taking
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml as inspiration (for no
> reason other than it was the first one that I came across that seemed to
> solve this same issue)

Yes just something minimal to start with.

Thanks,

Tony