linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] LoongArch: Use la.pcrel instead of la.abs for exception handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5adf0fc4-b75c-f7f2-311c-0f5d8f14311b@loongson.cn>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:59:08 +0800
From:   Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
To:     Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
Cc:     Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
        Jianmin lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>,
        Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] LoongArch: Use la.pcrel instead of la.abs for
 exception handlers

On 2023-02-16 10:32, Youling Tang wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> On 02/10/2023 05:18 PM, Youling Tang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/10/2023 05:09 PM, Huacai Chen wrote:
>>> Hi, Youling and Ruoyao,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for implementing the per-node exceptions. But I
>>> want to know if the per-node solution is really worthy for a PIE
>>> kernel. So, could you please test the performance? Maybe we can reduce
>>> the complexity if we give up the per-node solution.
>
> Tested on Loongson-3C5000L-LL machine, using CLFS7.3 system.
>
> - nopernode:
>   Based on the v1 patch method, and remove the else branch process in
>   setup_tlb_handler().
>
> - pernode: Based on the v4 patch method.
>
> - pie: Enable RANDOMIZE_BASE (KASLR).
>
> - nopie: Disable RANDOMIZE_BASE and RELOCATABLE.
>
>
> The UnixBench test results are as follows:
>
> - nopernode-nopie: 3938.7
>
> - pernode-nopie: 4062.2
>
> - nopernode-pie: 4009.7
>
> - pernode-pie: 4028.7
>
> In general, `pernode` is higher than `nopernode`, and `nopie` is higher
> than `pie`. (except that nopernode-pie is higher than nopernode-nopie,
> which is not as expected, which may be caused by the instability of the
> machine).
>
> Everyone is more inclined to use `pernode` or `nopernode` to implement
> in the exception handling process?
>
> Youling.

Hi, Youling,


Thanks for your test results.


I did an informal patch to keep la.abs, which think la.abs as a macro. 
just qemu test.

To test this patch, patch the [PATCH v4 1/5] [PATCH v4 3/5] as prediction.

This following patch just provides a method. I'm busy with other things. 
Hopefully it will help you simplify [PATCH v4 2/5].


Thanks,

Jinyang



diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/asmmacro.h 
b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/asmmacro.h
index 328bb956f241..6ebad458d662 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/asmmacro.h
+++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/asmmacro.h
@@ -667,4 +667,19 @@
      nor    \dst, \src, zero
  .endm

+.macro la.abs reg, sym
+766:
+    nop
+    nop
+    nop
+    nop
+    .pushsection ".laabs", "aw", %progbits
+768:
+    .word 768b-766b
+    parse_r regno, \reg
+    .word regno
+    .dword \sym
+    .popsection
+.endm
+
  #endif /* _ASM_ASMMACRO_H */
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S b/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S
index d2ac26b5b22b..3b273f05be8c 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(kernel_entry)            # kernel entry 
point
      PTR_ADD        sp, sp, tp
      set_saved_sp    sp, t0, t1

+    bl        relocate_laabs
      bl        start_kernel
      ASM_BUG()

diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c
index 4344502c0b31..9f8833a2524a 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c
@@ -582,3 +582,30 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)

      paging_init();
  }
+
+void __init relocate_laabs(void)
+{
+    extern void *__laabs_begin;
+    extern void *__laabs_end;
+    struct laabs {
+        int offset;
+        int reg;
+        long symvalue;
+    } *p;
+
+    for (p = (void *)&__laabs_begin; (void *)p < (void *)&__laabs_end; p++)
+    {
+        int lu12iw, ori, lu32id, lu52id;
+        long v = p->symvalue;
+        int reg = p->reg;
+        int *insn = (void *)p - p->offset;
+        lu12iw = 0x14000000 | reg | (((v & 0xfffff000) >> 12) << 5);
+        ori = 0x03800000 | reg | (reg<<5) | ((v & 0xfff) << 10);
+        lu32id = 0x16000000 | reg | (((v & 0x000fffff00000000) >> 32) 
<< 5);
+        lu52id = 0x03000000 | reg | (reg<<5) | (((v >> 52) & 0xfff) << 10);
+        insn[0] = lu12iw;
+        insn[1] = ori;
+        insn[2] = lu32id;
+        insn[3] = lu52id;
+    }
+}
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S 
b/arch/loongarch/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index 733b16e8d55d..4d128e089393 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -66,6 +66,13 @@ SECTIONS
          __alt_instructions_end = .;
      }

+    . = ALIGN(4);
+    .laabs : AT(ADDR(.laabs) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
+        __laabs_begin = .;
+        *(.laabs)
+        __laabs_end = .;
+    }
+
      .got : ALIGN(16) { *(.got) }
      .plt : ALIGN(16) { *(.plt) }
      .got.plt : ALIGN(16) { *(.got.plt) }