linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] watchdog: mt7621-wdt: avoid ralink architecture dependent code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ab1d573-aaf2-6747-291d-0c64a01b9ffc@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 09:20:15 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     wim@...ux-watchdog.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        arinc.unal@...nc9.com, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] watchdog: mt7621-wdt: avoid ralink architecture
 dependent code

On 14/02/2023 16:07, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/14/23 04:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 14/02/2023 13:10, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 2/14/23 00:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 13/02/2023 21:05, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
>>>>> MT7621 SoC has a system controller node. Watchdog need to access to reset
>>>>> status register. Ralink architecture and related driver are old and from
>>>>> the beggining they are using some architecture dependent operations for
>>>>> accessing this shared registers through 'asm/mach-ralink/ralink_regs.h'
>>>>> header file. However this is not ideal from a driver perspective which can
>>>>> just access to the system controller registers in an arch independent way
>>>>> using regmap syscon APIs. Update Kconfig accordingly to select new added
>>>>> dependencies and allow driver to be compile tested.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/watchdog/Kconfig      |  4 +++-
>>>>>    drivers/watchdog/mt7621_wdt.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>>>>>    2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
>>>>> index b64bc49c7..cf752ad64 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -1865,7 +1865,9 @@ config GXP_WATCHDOG
>>>>>    config MT7621_WDT
>>>>>    	tristate "Mediatek SoC watchdog"
>>>>>    	select WATCHDOG_CORE
>>>>> -	depends on SOC_MT7620 || SOC_MT7621
>>>>> +	select REGMAP_MMIO
>>>>> +	select MFD_SYSCON
>>>>> +	depends on SOC_MT7620 || SOC_MT7621 || COMPILE_TEST
>>>>>    	help
>>>>>    	  Hardware driver for the Mediatek/Ralink MT7621/8 SoC Watchdog Timer.
>>>>>    
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/mt7621_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/mt7621_wdt.c
>>>>> index 40fb2c9ba..22e979bdd 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/mt7621_wdt.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/mt7621_wdt.c
>>>>> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
>>>>>    #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>>>>>    #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>>>    #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>>>>> -
>>>>> -#include <asm/mach-ralink/ralink_regs.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>>>>>    
>>>>>    #define SYSC_RSTSTAT			0x38
>>>>>    #define WDT_RST_CAUSE			BIT(1)
>>>>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>>>>    struct mt7621_wdt_data {
>>>>>    	void __iomem *base;
>>>>>    	struct reset_control *rst;
>>>>> +	struct regmap *sysc;
>>>>>    	struct watchdog_device wdt;
>>>>>    };
>>>>>    
>>>>> @@ -104,9 +105,12 @@ static int mt7621_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *w)
>>>>>    	return 0;
>>>>>    }
>>>>>    
>>>>> -static int mt7621_wdt_bootcause(void)
>>>>> +static int mt7621_wdt_bootcause(struct mt7621_wdt_data *d)
>>>>>    {
>>>>> -	if (rt_sysc_r32(SYSC_RSTSTAT) & WDT_RST_CAUSE)
>>>>> +	u32 val;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	regmap_read(d->sysc, SYSC_RSTSTAT, &val);
>>>>> +	if (val & WDT_RST_CAUSE)
>>>>>    		return WDIOF_CARDRESET;
>>>>>    
>>>>>    	return 0;
>>>>> @@ -143,6 +147,10 @@ static int mt7621_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>    	if (!drvdata)
>>>>>    		return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>    
>>>>> +	drvdata->sysc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("mediatek,mt7621-sysc");
>>>>> +	if (IS_ERR(drvdata->sysc))
>>>>> +		return PTR_ERR(drvdata->sysc);
>>>>
>>>> This should be the backup/error path for original code using syscon
>>>> property. Looking up by compatible is really not portable/re-usable.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I really disagree here.
>>>
>>> $ git grep syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible | wc
>>>        90     326    8940
>>>
>>> I have not yet reviewed this code, but I do not accept this argument against it.
>>
>> First, argument that bad pattern is being used is not an argument to
>> keep it and repeat it.
>>
>> Second, we already had examples that:
>> 1. Author used syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible() and assumed "we will
>> never add new variant/soc".
>> 2. Then turns out that new variants are obviously added and
>> syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible() stops scaling.
>>
> 
> Your arguments only applies if 1) there is ever going to be a new Mediatek/Ralink
> chip with the same watchdog core, and 2) that chip also has the same watchdog
> related registers in its syscon node.
> 
> Both is highly unlikely to happen. There already is a more generic watchdog
> driver for later Mediatek chips (mtk_wdt.c). Even if Mediatek/Ralink ever
> decides to revive this specific watchdog core for whatever reason,
> the time to make the code more generic would have been at that time, at the same
> time ensuring that the more generic code actually works and does have the
> same syscon registers to obtain the boot status.

Sure. In other cases we experienced, people also claimed that this will
not happen. But it happened... I cannot judge whether this will happen
here or not, thus I give generic guideline. If you (singular and plural)
are sure this will not happen, then the code is fine.

> 
>> Whether any new variant/compatible/platform can appear for this watchdog
>> - I don't know.
>>
>> Third, with syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible() you have undocumented
>> (not in the binding) dependency between blocks which:
>> a. stops any reusability,
>> b. affects device links and probe ordering (simply - there is no, device
>> must defer probe),
>> c. is simply undocumented.
>>
>> The usage of syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible() has clear drawbacks
>> thus new code should rather use syscon phandles which solve all of above.
>>
> 
> "new code". Exactly. This isn't new code.

New code not as "new driver" but new code adding syscon usage. Syscon is
new here so we have flexibility to make it differently, and IMHO, one
way is better than other (for the reasons I stated).

> 
> In order to make progress, I'll accept v7, assuming its updated devicetree
> description is going to be accepted, but my argument still stands.


Best regards,
Krzysztof