[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cz6aot67.fsf@kurt>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 10:28:48 +0100
From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net/sched: taprio: dynamic max_sdu larger
than the max_mtu is unlimited
On Thu Feb 16 2023, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> It makes no sense to keep randomly large max_sdu values, especially if
> larger than the device's max_mtu. These are visible in "tc qdisc show".
> Such a max_sdu is practically unlimited and will cause no packets for
> that traffic class to be dropped on enqueue.
>
> Just set max_sdu_dynamic to U32_MAX, which in the logic below causes
> taprio to save a max_frm_len of U32_MAX and a max_sdu presented to user
> space of 0 (unlimited).
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Doesn't this deserve a Fixes tag as well?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (858 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists