lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 18:30:35 +0800
From:   William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] dt-bindings: syscon: Add StarFive syscon doc



On 2023/2/16 18:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/02/2023 12:32, William Qiu wrote:
>> Add documentation to describe StarFive System Controller Registers.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com>
>> ---
> 
> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
> 
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    items:
>> +      - enum:
>> +          - starfive,jh7110-stg-syscon
>> +          - starfive,jh7110-sys-syscon
>> +          - starfive,jh7110-aon-syscon
> 
> Maybe keep them ordered alphabetically?
> 

I'm sorting by register address, or I can keep them ordered
alphabetically,which is better?
>> +      - const: syscon
>> +
>> +  reg:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +required:
>> +  - compatible
>> +  - reg
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    syscon@...40000 {
>> +        compatible = "starfive,jh7110-stg-syscon", "syscon";
>> +        reg = <0x10240000 0x1000>;
>> +    };
> 
> Keep only one example. All others are the same.
> 
Will update in next version.
Thanks for taking times to review this patch series.

Best regards
William
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ