[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86pma9yjhs.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 10:47:43 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mun Yew Tham <mun.yew.tham@...el.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        Jay Fang <f.fangjian@...wei.com>,
        Daniel Palmer <daniel@...ngy.jp>,
        Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Mass convert GPIO IRQ chips to be immutable
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 09:37:01 +0000,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> We are getting tired of these irq_chips not getting converted
> to be immutable, so I just take out the big hammer and fix
> some that I deem not too complex as best I can.
Thanks for taking the hit on this one.
I had a cursory look, and they seem fine overall. only the omap one
looks a bit scary, but I take it that Tony can give that one a go
before it gets merged.
FWIW:
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
	M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists