[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86pma9yjhs.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 10:47:43 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Mun Yew Tham <mun.yew.tham@...el.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Jay Fang <f.fangjian@...wei.com>,
Daniel Palmer <daniel@...ngy.jp>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Mass convert GPIO IRQ chips to be immutable
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 09:37:01 +0000,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> We are getting tired of these irq_chips not getting converted
> to be immutable, so I just take out the big hammer and fix
> some that I deem not too complex as best I can.
Thanks for taking the hit on this one.
I had a cursory look, and they seem fine overall. only the omap one
looks a bit scary, but I take it that Tony can give that one a go
before it gets merged.
FWIW:
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists