[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31e377b7-88bf-8737-0397-44ecca8cff54@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:03:52 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@...sung.com>, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
kw@...ux.com, robh@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
jingoohan1@...il.com, Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru,
lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, hongxing.zhu@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, jh80.chung@...sung.co,
pankaj.dubey@...sung.com
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/16] arm64: dts: exynos: Rename the term elbi to appl
On 14/02/2023 13:13, Shradha Todi wrote:
> DT uses the name elbi in reg-names for application logic
> registers which is a wrong nomenclature. This patch fixes
> the same.
>
> This commit shouldn't be applied without changes
> "dt-bindings: PCI: Rename the term elbi to appl" and
> "PCI: samsung: Rename the term elbi to appl"
Dependencies and patch ordering goes after '---', because there is no
point to store it in git history.
Anyway, that's an ABI break and Exynos5433 is quite stable, so without
clear indication of fixed bug, we should not do this.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists